Constantine’s Conversion [Model Paper]



Download 3.13 Kb.
Date09.05.2016
Size3.13 Kb.
#36876
Constantine’s Conversion [Model Paper]

  1. Although the story of the Roman Emperor Constantine’s conversion to Christianity has often been told in a simple, straightforward way, recent research shows a more complex picture. Other than Eusebius’ Life of Constantine, there is little evidence demonstrating that Constantine knew much about his new religion. In fact, Constantine may have worshipped the cult of the “unconquered son” as evidence from coins and statues suggests. His conversion, which took place in a dream or during a vision he saw in battle, depending on which version you read, linked his victory at the Milvian Bridge in 312 AD to the Christian god or sun god Apollo. But whether this was a genuine religious conversion, or a clever political decision to keep Christian and pagans happy is hard to tell.

  2. Clearly, Constantine’s conversion was not straightforward or simple anymore than the Gospels are simple accounts of exactly what Jesus said or did. Our main source, Eusebius, was a Christian bishop telling the story of a Christian hero from a Christian point of view. This evidence cannot be taken at simple face value. Once we look at other evidence, it’s not even clear that Constantine was a Christian. He seems to have combined Christian ideas with pagan ideas about the sun god. Whether Constantine was moved by religion, politics, or both is open to interpretation. It appears that his conversion was a complex mix of both religion and politics. In any case, it had an enormous impact on the history of Christianity, giving it support of the emperor to build churches, end the persecution of Christians, and link victory in battle with the favor of the Christian god. All of these would help the continued spread of Christianity, regardless of Constantine’s motives or personal beliefs.

Directory: ryost -> hist201 -> Monarchy
Monarchy -> Columbus Hero or Villain?
hist201 -> Primary sources
Monarchy -> Excerpts from The Closing of the Western Mind (2002) by Charles Freeman Constantine & the Coming of the Christian State In the fourth century Christianity became the “official” religion of the Roman empire
Monarchy -> 1066 The Norman Conquest: Old English to Middle English
Monarchy -> Europe: Age of Monarchy (Exam Two, Spring 2003) What are the strengths of each essay? How could they be improved? What letter grade would you give each essay? Justify your grade
Monarchy -> Which answer is the best and why? Remember these were written with open notes given about 6-7 minutes to write. Grade each answer on a 10-point scale. Magna Carta
Monarchy -> King Alfred the Great & Anglo-Saxon [“Old English”] Scholarship 1 Introduction
Monarchy -> The Great Stirrup Controversy
Monarchy -> Best two and the worst two. Be able to justify

Download 3.13 Kb.

Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©www.essaydocs.org 2022
send message

    Main page