WHO WAS BETTER OFF?
A COMPARISON OF AMERICAN SLAVES AND ENGLISH AGRICULTURAL WORKERS, 1750-1875
BY
ERIC V. SNOW
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. WHY COMPARE ENGLISH LABORERS AND AMERICAN SLAVES TO BEGIN WITH? . . 10
The Standard Comparison of Factory Workers with Slaves 10
Why Do Such a Comparison? 10
What Exactly Is Compared Out of Each Diverse Group 12
Five Broad Areas for Comparison Purposes 12
2. A HISTORICAL PERENNIAL: THE STANDARD OF LIVING DEBATE 14
Some Theoretical Problems in Comparing Slaves and Laborers'
Standard of Living 14
Diet and the Standard of Living for Slaves 17
Fogel and Engerman's Optimistic Reconstructions of the Slave
Diet 18
The Slave Diet as Crude, Coarse, and Boring 21
Differing Diets for Slaves with Different Positions 23
The Slaves' Role in Providing Themselves with Food on Their
Own 25
Variations in What Food Different Slaveowners Provided Their
Own Slaves With 26
The Diet of English Farmworkers: Regional Variations 28
The Southern English Agricultural Workers' Diet Was Poor,
Often Meatless 30
Grains, Especially Wheat, Dominate the Agricultural Workers'
Diet 32
The Role of Potatoes in the Laborers' Diet, Despite
Prejudices Against Them 33
Did Farmworkers Prefer Coarse or Fine Food? 34
The Monotony of the Farmworkers' Diet in the South of England 36
The Superior Conditions of the Northern English Farmworkers 37
Meat as a Near Luxury for Many Farmworkers 39
The Effects of Enclosure and Allotments on Hodge's Diet 40
Comparing Food Received by English Paupers, Slaves, and Their
Nation's Army 42
Better Bread Versus Little Meat? The Slave Versus Farmworker
Diet 43
Clothing for Slaves 44
Bad Clothing Conditions for Slaves 45
Differences in Clothing Provided for Slaves with Different
Position 46
The Factory Versus Homespun: The Master's Decision 48
Slaves and Shoe Shortages 49
Fogel and Engerman's Optimistic Take on Slaves' Clothing
Rations 51
Clothing and English Agricultural Workers 51
The Low Standards for Farmworkers, Especially in Southern
England 52
Homespun More Common in America than England by C. 1830 53
Special Measures Needed to Buy Their Own Clothes 54
Housing For Slaves: Variations around a Low Average Standard 55
Cases of Good Slave Houses 58
Was Poor White Housing Little Better than the Slaves'? 59
Fogel and Engerman's Optimistic View of Slave Housing 59
Genovese's Overly Optimistic Take on Slave Housing 60
The Moral Hazards of Crowded, One-Room Slave Houses 62
Slave Housing--Sanitation and Cleanliness 63
English Farmworkers' Housing--Quality/Size 64
Poor Housing Leads to Sexual Immorality 66
How the Artist's Eye Can Be Self-Deceiving When Evaluating
Cottages' Quality 68
How Rentals and the Poor and Settlement Laws Made for Poor
Quality Housing 69
The Problem of Cottages Being Distant from Work 70
The Aristocracy's Paternalism in Providing Housing, and Its
Limits 71
Little Difference for Slaves and Farmworkers in the Quality of
Their Housing 73
Agricultural Workers--Sanitation/Cleanliness 74
Slaves--Furniture and Personal Effects 76
English Agricultural Workers: Home Furnishings, Utensils,
etc. 78
Fuel--Sambo's Supply Versus Hodge's 79
Sambo's Medical Care 82
The General Backwardness of Antebellum Medical Care 83
Masters Sought Ways to Reduce Medical Expenses 84
Masters and Overseers as Amateur Healers for Slaves 84
Black Medical Self-Help: Conjurors and Midwives 86
Medical Care for English Agricultural Workers 87
Whose Medical Care Was Better? Hodge's? Or Sambo's? 91
The Overall Material Standard of Living: Was Hodge or Sambo
Better Off? 92
Trickle-Down Economics with a Vengeance: How the Slaves
Benefited 93
3. THE QUALITY OF LIFE: SLAVES VERSUS AGRICULTURAL WORKERS 95
The Quality of Life as Opposed to the (Material) Standard of
Living 95
Literacy and Education for African-American Slaves 96
Why Slaveholders Sought to Keep Slaves Illiterate 98
English Farmworkers, Literacy and Education 102
A Brief Sketch of the Development of English Public Education 104
What Age Did Child Labor Begin and Schooling End? 105
Ignorance Versus Skewed Knowledge: Different Models for
Controlling a Subordinate Class 106
Slaves--The Treatment of Elderly "Aunts" and "Uncles" 109
Altruism and Self-Interest Did Not Necessarily Conveniently
Coincide to Protect Elderly Slaves' Lives 110
Did Slavery Provide More Security Against Starvation than
Laissez-Faire? 110
Odd Jobs for Elderly Slaves 112
The Senior Hodge: Cared for, or Fends for Himself? 113
The Effects of the New Poor Law on the Elderly, Non-Working
Poor 115
How the Local Authorities Profited from the Workhouse Test 117
Whose Elderly Were Better Off? The Farmworkers' or the
Slaves'? 118
The Slave Childhood: Full of Fun or Full of Fear? 119
Pastimes for Slave Children 120
Plantation Day Care: How Slave Childhood Was Different 123
Is All Work Bad for Children? 124
The Slave Childhood: Good, Bad, or Indifferent? 125
Hodge's Childhood: More Work, But More Worthwhile? 126
Just How Common Was Child Labor, Especially in the
Countryside 128
The Parental Push for Child Labor 130
Day Care Not a Common Experience 131
Young Hodge at Play 132
The Relative Quality of Life for the Children of Slaves and
Laborers 133
Religion--A Site for Enlightenment, Social Unity, and Social
Conflict 134
Slave Religion--The Slaveholders' Options on Christianizing
the Slaves 135
The Earlier Practice of Not Evangelizing the Slaves 137
The Gospel of Obedience Distorts the Christianity Given to
the Slaves 137
The Slaves Add to the Religion Given Them by Their Masters
and Mistresses 139
No Surprise: The Slaves' Lack of Religious Freedom 141
The Slaves Unbend a Bent Christianity 142
Slave Preachers: Their Role and Power 144
Did Slaveholders Achieve Religious and Ideological Hegemony
Over the Slaves? 145
English Agricultural Workers and Christianity 149
Reasons for the Established Church's Unpopularity with the
Laborers 149
How the Local Elite Can Use Charity to Control the Poor 151
The Laborers’ Turn to Nonconformity and Its Mixed Results 153
Christianity: An Instigator of Laborers' Resistance? 154
Similarities in Southern White and English Lower Class
Religion 155
Somehow Seeking Participation in and Control of One's
Destiny: The Consolations of Faith? 156
The Slave Family: How Well Did It Survive Slavery? 157
The Family Bonds of Slaves Made Conditional Upon the
Stability of the Slaveholders 159
The Routine Destruction of Family Relationships under Slavery 161
Fogel and Engerman's Mistakenly Low Figures on Marriage
Breakup 164
How the Slaves' Fears about Family Breakup Could Make For
Continual Anxiety 165
The Process of Being Bought and Sold as Itself Dehumanizing 166
How Slavery Undermined the Families of Slaves 166
How Slavery Weakened the Father's Role 167
Factors Which Encouraged Slaves to Treat Marriage Bonds
Casually 170
How Slavery Encouraged a Casual Approach to Family
Relationships 171
The Ways Slavery Destroyed Family Relationships 173
How the Master Could Routinely Interfere in Slave Family
Relationships 174
Master-Arranged Marriages 175
Just How Common Was Miscegenation? 176
Despite the Pressures, Slaves Still Maintained Some Form of
Family Life 178
The Key Issues Involved in Examining the Quality of Farm-
worker Family Life 179
The "Weber/Gillis" Thesis Summarized: Was Brutish Family
Life the Norm? 180
The Limits to Snell's Rebuttal Against Seeing Lower Class
Family Life as Harsh 182
How Not Being Independent and Self-Sufficient Could Improve
Family Life 184
The Limits to Applying the Gillis-Weber Thesis to the
English Case 186
Some Evidence Bearing on the Quality of Farmworkers' Family
Life 187
Why the Slave Family was Fundamentally Worse Off than the
Laborer Family 189
Why the Laborers Had a Higher Overall Quality of Life than
the Slaves 190
The Problems of Comparing the Slaves' and Laborers' Quality
of Religious Experience 190
How Elderly Slaves Could Have Been Better Off Than the
Elderly Farmworkers 192
How the Slaves' More Carefree Childhood Was Not Necessarily
a Better One 192
The Hazards of Historical Analysis that Uses the Values of
Those in the Past 194
4. THE SEXUAL DIVISION OF LABOR: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 196
The Sexual Division of Labor: African-American Slaves 196
Kemble on a Stricter Sexual Division of Labor's Advantages 197
Jobs Female Slaves Had 198
Qualifications about the Generally Weak Sexual Division of
Labor among Slaves 201
Plantation Day Care Revisited 202
The Sexual Division of Labor: English Agricultural Workers 203
Women's Work in Arable Areas at Harvest Time Increased
Later in the Century 204
The Female Dominance of Dairy Work Declines 205
How the Separate Spheres' View on Sex Roles Influenced the
1867-68 Report 206
Why Did Laboring Women Increasingly Fall Out of the Field
Labor Force? 207
Allotments Partially Restore the Family Economy 209
Quality of Life Issues and the Sexual Division of Labor 209
The Division of Labor: Blessing or Curse? 211
Who Was Better Off Depends on the Values One Has 213
5. CONTROLLING SUBORDINATE CLASSES--HOW IT WAS DONE 213
The Central Reality of Work and the Elite's Needs for
Controlling Its Workers 213
Dawn to Dusk--Work Hours for Slaves 215
Using Force to Get Slaves into the Fields in the Morning 215
Finishing Work for the Day--Some Variations 217
Hours of Work--Agricultural Workers 218
Were Workdays Shorter for the Farmworkers than the Slaves? 219
The Length of the Workweek and Days off--Slaves 221
Slaves Normally Did Not Work on Sundays 221
Holidays the Slaves Did Not Work On 223
Unplanned Days Off Due to Weather or the State of Crops 224
The Days of Work for Agricultural Workers 225
Those Laborers Who Had to Work Sundays, and Those Who Did Not 226
Seasonal and Other Changes in the Workweek, and Their Effects
on Unemployment 228
How "Voluntarily" Did Slaves Work? The Necessity of Coercion
and Supervision 230
Why the Whip Had to Be Used to Impose Work Discipline on the
Slaves 231
How Commonly Were the Slaves Whipped? The Time on the Cross
Controversy 233
The Deterrence Value of Occasional Killings 235
The Danger of Corporal Punishment Backfiring, Requiring
"Massive Retaliation" 236
How Even Good Masters Could Suddenly Kill a Slave in the
Heat of Passion 237
Miscellaneous Punishments that Masters Inflicted on Slaves 238
Examples of Corporal Punishment Backfiring 239
Did Slaveowners Successfully Implant a Protestant Work Ethic
in the Slaves? 240
The Slaves' Sense of Work Discipline Like that of Other
Pre-Industrial People 242
Genovese's Paternalism: How Successful Were Planters in
Imposing Hegemony? 244
Scott Versus Hegemony 244
Were the Slaveholders Really Believers in Paternalism?: The
Implications of Jacksonian Democracy and Commercial
Capitalism in the American South 247
Counter-Attacks Against Portraying Slaveholders as Bourgeois
Individualists 249
Ignorance as a Control Device Revisited 252
How Masters Would Manipulate the Slaves' Family Ties in Order
to Control Them 253
Positive Incentives Only a Supplementary Method for
Controlling the Bondsmen 255
The Brutal Overseer as a Historical Reality 258
The Task Versus Gang Systems: Different Approaches to Work
Discipline 260
The Infrapolitics of Task (Quota) Setting 261
The Gang System's Advantages 262
The Patrol/Pass System 264
The Slaveowners Who Liberally Granted Passes or Dispensed with
Them Altogether 266
How the Divisions Among White Slaveholders Benefited the
Enslaved 267
How Mistresses and other Family Members Often Restrained Ill-
Treatment 268
The Central Reality of Violence as the Main Tool to Control
the Slaves 269
The High Levels of Violence Between the Slaves and Masters
Compared to England 271
Both Sides committed Far Less Violence During the Swing Riots
in England 272
The Lower Goals and Greater Divisions among Local Elites in
the English Case 273
The Routine Police State Measures in the South 275
Coercion, Not Incentives or Ideology, as the Basic Means of
Enforcing Slavery 276
Basic Differences Between the American and English Elites'
Methods of Control 276
The Freedom of Action Local Government Officials Had in
England 277
The Basic Strategy to Better Control the Farmworkers 278
Enclosure as a Method of Social Control and "Class Robbery" 279
Enclosure: Direct Access to the Means of Production and
Some Food Both Lost 280
Open and Close Parishes: One Dumps Laborers onto the Other 282
The Decline of Service 284
Why Service Declined 285
How Poor Relief Itself Promoted Population Growth 287
Assorted Methods that Deterred Applicants for Relief 288
Why "Make-Work" Jobs Failed to Deter Applicants and
Undermined Work Discipline 289
The New Poor Law: Deterring Applicants for Relief by
Using the Workhouse Test 290
Falling Productivity: One More Consequence of the Old Poor
Law 292
The Workhouse Test as a Tool for Increasing Labor
Productivity 293
The Workhouse Test Was a Tool for Lowering Wages Also 294
Allotments Help Reduce Increases in Rates Caused by Enclosure 296
Why the Rural Elite Still Sometimes Opposed Allotments 297
Miscellaneous Ways Allotments Were Used to Benefit the Rural
Elite 298
Another Positive Mode of Creating Work Discipline: Piecework 300
The Legal System and Its Influence on the Laborers 303
The Justice of the Peace/County Court System Necessarily
Expressed Class Bias 303
The Biases of the Courts Against the Laborers Should Not Be
Exaggerated 304
Ignorance of the Law as a Control Device 305
Examples of How the Contents of the Law Could be Against the
Laborers 306
The Important Differences Between Controlling the Laborers
and Slaves at Work 307
Ideological Hegemony, Paternalism, Class Consciousness, and
Farmworkers 309
Did Some in the Elite Begin to Repudiate Paternalistic,
Communal Values? 309
How the Rural Elite Tried to Have Paternalism and Capitalism
Simultaneously 310
Paternalism Vs. Capitalism: The Trade-Offs between Freedom
and Security 311
How the Waning of Paternalism Made the Laborers' Class
Consciousness Possible 313
The Power of Gifts to Control, and When They Do Not 313
The Failure of Paternalism as an Ideological Control Device
from C. 1795 314
The Laborers' Growing Class Consciousness, C. 1834 to 1850 315
When the Laborers as a Class in Itself Began to Act for
Itself 317
A Comparison of Respective Elite Control Strategies: Slave-
owners and Squires 318
How Much Success Did These Two Elites Have at Hegemony? 322
6. ON RESISTANCE BY A SUBORDINATE CLASS 325
The Infrapolitics of Daily Life 325
Analytical Problems with "Day-to-Day Resistance"
(Infrapolitics) 325
The Continuum of Resistance from Infrapolitics to Organized
Insurrection 326
The Need for a Subordinate Class to Wear a Mask to Conceal
Their Knowledge 328
Early Training in Mask Wearing 329
The Costs of Being Open and the Mask Falling Off 330
The Subordinate Class's Compulsions to Lie 330
Why the Rituals of Deference Still Had Meaning 332
Elkins's "Sambo" Hypothesis and Its Problems 333
An Act of Routine Resistance: Stealing 338
Various Motives for Theft 338
The Intrinsic Costs of Double-Standards in Morality 339
Evading Work by Claiming Sickness 341
Work: Slowdowns and Carelessness 342
The Strategy of Playing the White Folks Off Against Each
Other 343
Manipulating White Authority for the Slaves' Own Purposes 343
How Pleadings and Petitions Could Restrain Masters and
Mistresses 343
The General Problem of Slaves Running Away 344
Temporary and Local Flight 346
"Negotiating" a Return 347
How Runaways Could Resist Capture 348
Maroons: Settlements of Escaped Slaves 349
The Most Successful Runaways 350
"Strikes" Conducted by Groups of Slaves Running Away 352
Small Scale Open Confrontations and Violence 353
"Nats" or "Sambos"?--Selective Perception by the Master Class 355
The Rarity of Slave Revolts in the United States Compared
to Elsewhere 356
The Factors Militating Against Slave Revolts in the United
States 357
Many Slaves Knew How Much the Deck Was Stacked Against
Successful Revolt 359
Why then, If Revolts Were So Rare, Were the Whites So
Paranoid? 360
Resistance to Slavery in the United States Is Dominated by
Infrapolitics 362
Resident Slaveholders Supervising Small Units of Production
Smother Resistance 363
Resisting Enslavement Is Not the Same as Resisting Slavery
as a Social System 364
Hodge: The Predominance of Daily Infrapolitics Over Outright
Riots 366
Social Crime--The Infrapolitics of Poaching 367
The Laborers' Counter-Ideology Against the Elite's Game Laws 368
The Role of Theft, More Generally Defined, in English
Rural Infrapolitics 369
The Correlation between Poverty and Theft 370
Hodge's Thinner Mask 370
How Farmworkers Could "Run Away"--Resistance Through Migra-
tion 372
The Reluctance of Laborers to Move and Other Obstacles to
Migration 373
The Tamer Confrontations between Hodge and His Masters 375
Food Riots as a Method of Resistance 376
The Swing Riots Generally Considered 378
How the Laborers Did Benefit Some from the Swing Riots 379
The Relative Weakness of the Farmworkers' Unions Compared
to Others in England 380
The Organization of the Agricultural Labours' Union in 1872 381
Comparing Two Subordinate Classes' Methods of Resistance 383
7. CONCLUSIONS: THE BALANCE BETWEEN "RESISTANCE" AND "DAMAGE"? 386
Resistance and the Subordinate Class's Quality of Life 386
Slavery Is on a Continuum of Social Systems of Subordination 388
Selected Bibliography 390
1. WHY COMPARE ENGLISH LABORERS AND AMERICAN SLAVES TO BEGIN WITH?
The Standard Yet Problematic Comparison of Factory Workers with Slaves
Mississippi slaveowner and politician John A. Quitman "professed little respect for the northern free-labor system, where 'factory wretches' worked eleven-hour days in 'fetid' conditions while their intellects were destroyed 'watching the interminable whirling of the spinning-jenny.' . . . The Quitman plantations functioned satisfactorily, and his bondsmen were appreciative of their condition. He described his slaves as 'faithful, obedient, and affectionate.'" Quitman's comparison is still made today when debates break out over the standard of living about who was better off: slaves versus [Northern] factory workers, not farm servants. Similarly, while examining general European conditions for workers, Jurgen Kuczynski states: "It is precisely these bad conditions which justify the arguments of the slaveowners of the South, that the slaves are materially better off than the workers in the north. This would in many cases have been true." Despite its frequency, this comparison is actually problematic: It discounts the additional effects of urbanization, crowding, and doing industrial/shop work inside. In the countryside, with its low population density and work in the fields outside, people experience a different way and quality of life. The conditions of urban factory life simply are not tied to the legal status of being free or slave. This common comparison actually contrasts two very different ways of life, urban versus rural, factory versus farm, to which widely varying value judgments can be attached. As E. P. Thompson observes: "In comparing a Suffolk [farm] labourer with his grand-daughter in a cotton-mill we are comparing--not two standards [of living]--but two ways of life."1 By likening some other agricultural labor force to the slaves of the American South before the Civil War, many of the apples/oranges comparison problems are eliminated. This work shows the largely landless English agricultural workers during the general period of the industrial revolution (c. 1750-1875) had a superior quality of life of compared to the black slaves in the American South (c. 1750-1865), but that the latter at times had a material standard of living equal to or greater than the former's, at least in southern England.
Why Do Such a Comparison?
A historical comparison brings into focus features of both subjects under study that might otherwise go unnoticed. New insights may be gained, which might be missed when highly specialized historians devoted to a particular field analyze historical phenomena stay strictly within their area of expertise. Suddenly, through historical comparison and contrast, the pedestrian can become exceptional, and what was deemed unusual becomes part of a pattern. For example, both the agricultural workers and the slaves found ways to resist the powerful in their respective societies, but their forms of resistance differed since their legal statuses differed. In the preface of his study of American slavery and Russian serfdom, Kolchin observes some of the advantages of doing such a comparison. It reduces parochialism in given fields, allows features to be seen as significant that otherwise might be overlooked, makes for the formulation and testing of hypotheses, and helps to distinguish which variables and causal factors had more weight.2 A comparative topic is justified, even when it deals with phenomena long since analyzed by historians, if it wrings new insights out of the same old sources. It may expose assumptions about events or processes experts take for granted or overlook in the fields being compared. One suspects sometimes labor historians and African-American slavery historians may be letting their respective historiographical work pass each other like ships in the night, not knowing the valuable insights one group may have for the study of the other's field.3
Share with your friends: |